Wednesday, December 28, 2011

One Weird Old Trick

I have been inundated with these stupid, stupid ads. I can’t take it anymore. It has hit the level of absurd. Daily I have to hear about someone in ERIE (yes, they use targeted advertising and know where my DNS pings) who has discovered a weird old trick to do something fantastic. Supposedly, I can use this old tip, which, by the way, is weird, to do the same. Often these ads are accompanied by the most ridiculous pictures you’ve ever seen.
Allegedly this weird old trick was discovered by a single mom…a paraplegic soldier…an unemployed first responder…or any other sympathetic character. The hope is that you are simply consumed with curiosity to know what the heck is that ONE weird secret. This urge is further augmented by the noted fact that the powers that be don't want you to know.  These are the one percenters keeping the 99% down. Michael Moore is doing a documentary on it. They don't want the masses to know how easy it is to:
·         Increase muscle mass
·         Increase breast size (absurd photo accompanies this)
·         Enlarge a male member 
·         Lose weight or spot reduce an area, usually belly fat
·         Pay your mortgage off in a fraction of the time (bankers don’t want you to know this weird old trick)
·         Brighten teeth (dentists hate the person who discovered this weird old trick)
·         Clear up acne (dermatologists hate the person who discovered this weird old trick)
·         Pay pennies for car insurance
·         Go back to school for free (one weird old trick?)
·         Beat a traffic ticket (police don’t want you to know about this weird old trick)
·         Get out of a DUI.
·         Make your own electricity at home (utilities companies don’t want you to know about this weird old trick)
·         Etc, etc, etc…
If you click on the ad you will be taken to a fake blog (flog) or a fake article (farticle) where the hard sell really begins. You may even be sold real products – acai berries, for example – but they will not spot reduce belly fat or enlarge a sex organ.
I wish there was a weird old trick to make these ads go away! Evidently they have discovered one wierd old trick for driving gullible traffic to their websites.  

Friday, December 9, 2011

Merry Frickin' Christmas (Depression and Diabetes Redux)

If you have read through my blog posts you know that I am interested in the comorbidity of depression and diabetes. Increasingly, I am seeing more and more on this topic in mainstream sources. The holiday season is a particular stress on diabetics. The reasons are not as obvious as they may seem.

Yes, it is harder to control blood sugars if all that temptation in the form of treats are always stuck in front of your face. But it goes beyond that. The real stress of the holidays (and yes, I know the holidays are stressful for everyone) comes more in the social interaction demands. The co-occurrence of mood swings and diabetes makes this season a particularly difficult one for many diabetics. I can't tell you the extent of my own difficulties in juggling the "merriness" of the season with my opposite affect syndrome. Indirect B always comes back with a vengence. Anyway, consider the article below.

This latest comes from RealAge.com

3 Reasons to Curb High Blood Sugar

No doubt you already know about diabetes' scary complications, from heart disease to blindness and nerve damage, but did you know that diabetes can take a huge toll on your personal life, too? According to data we analyzed from 1 million RealAgers, it can impact your life in 3 key ways:

1. Relationships. People with diabetes are far less likely than nondiabetics to spend time with friends or relatives. They're also more than twice as likely as those without diabetes to say they're unhappily married. That's not surprising. Diabetes can make you prone to depression and anxiety, both of which are hard on relationships. It can also put the brakes on your sex life by causing vaginal dryness in women, and low testosterone and erectile dysfunction in men.

2. Depression. People with diabetes were twice as likely as the general population to suffer from depression. Diabetes may cause changes in the brain that contribute to depression, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. The stress and expense of managing an all-encompassing condition like diabetes also can make you more vulnerable to depression.

3. Finances. Diabetics are three times more likely than nondiabetics to report severe financial stress. This may be because type 2 diabetes hits low-income communities especially hard, but diabetes is expensive no matter where you live. According to the American Diabetes Association, people newly diagnosed with diabetes spend $4,174 a year more on medical costs than those who don't have diabetes. That figure goes up another $158 every year after that.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Merriam-Webster Top 10 User-submitted Words


#1: Humble Brag
Example:
"Facebook seems to be the perfect place for this. How many status reads have actually been humble brags?" – post on Elizabeth Runs blog, February 25, 2011

 #2: Planking
Example:
"Planking has achieved notoriety as an online fad, as people try to plank in the most unlikely places." – Los Angeles Times, July 28, 2011

#3: Capgras' Delusion
Example:
"Capgras delusion can be brought about by a variety of conditions – changes in brain chemistry associated with different mental illnesses, or physical trauma to the brain – but the delusion always involves the distinct feeling that the people around you have been replaced by impostors." – Jad Abumrad and Robert Krulwich, NPR Morning Edition, March 30, 2010


#4: Intexticated
Example:
"[Justin Bieber] says he was inspired to get involved in the campaign because of the Alex Brown Foundation, which is a charity named after a teenager who died because he was driving while intexticated." – Darian Demetri, Teenchive.com, July 20, 2011


#5: Epic Fail
Example:
"Righting the struggling economy through saner, sounder fiscal policies is not the only issue that should be ranked an 'epic fail' on Capitol Hill over the last decade." – Sid Salter, ClarionLedger.com, Aug. 9, 2011


#6: Stuffocation
Example:
"Over the weekend, I worked on filling two more storage tubs for our local consignment store, as I do every month. ... Regularly consigning two tubs of stuff ... is how I prevent 'stuffocation.'" – post on WantingWhatYouHave.com, September 13, 2010


#7: Kidult
Example:
"But alpha male has been superseded by omega male, the under-achieving, low-testosterone kidult who lounges at the other end of the blokey spectrum, playing computer games and watching Lost." – Kevin Courtney, Irish Times, July 30, 2011


#8: Tanorexic
Example:
"The cast of 'Jersey Shore' has arrived. Everyone's favorite tanorexic reality stars claimed they had made it after appearing in cartoon form on 'South Park' Wednesday." – Soraya Roberts, New York Daily News, October 14, 2010

#9: Longboard
Example:
"A man riding a longboard has hilariously demonstrated how not to dismount while speeding down a road in Portugal." – NineMSN.com, July 22, 2011

#10: Coffice
Example:
"Acceptable 'coffice' etiquette states that something must be ordered during your stay." – post on GetItBusinessServices.com, April 21, 2011

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

What's Your Blindspot?

Recent Gallop research states everyone is born with a talent he or she can demonstrate with more proficiency than at least 10,000 people. A good education, or employer, helps people unveil and utilize their gift. People who remain stuck in unsatisfying careers don't seem to know themselves, or haven't stumbled into their talent.

Joseph Luft and Harry Ingham created the Johari Window. It's a four panel grid showing what a person knows and doesn't know about oneself with what others know and don't know about a person. The resulting boxes include: public skills, private traits, blind spots, and untapped potential.

Two years ago a Rhode Island high school track athlete was trying different events when his coach suggested he try the long jump and measure his jumping distance. When the student returned with the measuring tape, the coach asked how far he'd jumped.

The student responded: "21 feet". In disbelief, the coach asked him to jump again. The student jumped again. This time, closer to 22 feet. He also jumped six feet, four inches in his first attempt, ever, in the high jump.

This past year, Innocent Jacob led the U.S. indoor jumpers for much of the season with a distance of 24'-01" at Rhode Island Classic. This came a day after his 6'-11" high jump PR ranked him second in the U.S. He has has broken R.I. state long jump record 3 times.

Had not his coach suggested he try the long jump, would Innocent Jacob ever known he had the talent?

Friday, November 11, 2011

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Thursday, September 29, 2011

What does the $16 muffin really mean?

By Steve Kelman
Federal Computer Weekly

Blogger's Note: I agree that government spending is way out of whack, but distorted and slanted  reporting, such as the type that this article rebutts, merely serve to give media types, like Beck and Hannity, ammo for their "shoot first, ask questions later" type rhetoric. Yeah, I agree that $16 a muffin is a waste, but if it included all the things that Hilton said were included, then it was a good bargain - and pretty much in line with what private businesses pay for these events. My own opinion is that the costs here were justified, but to reduce costs in the future they should utilize technolgy and have more teleconferencing. Feds could use a local hotel's conference rooms and still have the "$16 muffins", i.e., location costs, but videoconference the presentations and save the taxpayer the costs of travel and lodging. I think we would be farther ahead by using some common sense on both sides.

I don't agree with everyting Kelman says here, but I think he has a good point. It's worth the read.

 
     $600 hammer, step aside. The media has been abuzz with the story that the Department of Justice paid $16 apiece for muffins eaten at one department-sponsored conference. The Washington Post story on the costs paid for food service got far more comments on the paper’s website and tweets than President Obama’s speech around the same time to the General Assembly on Israel and Palestine.

     Clearly this story makes great copy. But I have to ask two questions. First, is it true as an individual anecdote? Second, is it helpful to efforts to get the nation’s fiscal house in order?

     On the first question, I will confess I am not a muffin expert. However, I have, over 30 years as a public management professor, frequently examined similar claims about outrageous government waste (and eaten several muffins). These claims turn out to be misleading, incomplete, and downright mistaken.

     About 25 years ago I examined 10 claims about egregious government waste highlighted in the press release of the Reagan-era Grace Commission to illustrate their findings. Not one of the cases was correct as stated. (In one case, the commission misplaced a decimal point, inflating the purported government cost tenfold.) In the case of the $16 muffins, it appears that perhaps the hotels are providing the actual function rooms at no separate charge, and baking (so to speak) the cost of the room into the item charge for the refreshments.

     However, there is a much broader issue than muffins. The fact is that the public has a bizarrely inflated idea of the role these kinds of examples of waste (or alleged waste) play in our fiscal problems. In a survey a number of years ago, the public on average believed that $52 out of every $100 in social security expenditures went to administrative costs. The real figure at the time of the survey was $1.30. (It's probably lower today.) The public is frequently asked what percentage of the federal budget goes to foreign aid. On average, people think it is 25 percent. The real figure is 1 percent.

     This kind of misunderstanding has consequences. With due respect to the dysfunctionality of our political system, a fundamental reason it is so difficult to deal with our long-term fiscal woes is that the American people are not convinced we need either benefit cuts or tax increases to deal with the problem -- they have the illusion we can eliminate the deficit if only we can stop bureaucrats from gorging on $16 muffins. A lot of what the politicians are doing is to respond to that popular delusion.

     So the most damaging myth -- nurtured by the muffin madness -- is that we can solve our fiscal crisis without doing some unpleasant things.

Washington Post, September 22, 2011:
Hilton Worldwide, which manages and franchises hotels including the Capital Hilton where the conference took place, says the price included not only breakfast baked goods but also fresh fruit, coffee, tea, soft drinks, tax and tips. It says the report misinterpreted its invoices, which often use shorthand and don’t reflect the full menu provided.
Nor did it reflect the cost of the training lounge or the breakout rooms.

AND YET ANOTHER MUFFIN UPDATE (Nov 1, 2011):
The Justice Department Inspector General has rescinded its claim about muffins at a conference costing $16 each. After further investigation, the IG has written that "we determined that our initial conclusions concerning the itemized costs of refreshments at the . . . conference were incorrect."

Why is it that, upon further investigation, these initial reports turn out to be blatantly untrue?

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

George Marlin Quote - Narcissist Nation


"If you look at the extreme left elites, they really don’t have much use for democracy anymore because they’re afraid people will not vote their way. So they bite away at the democratic process by imposing upon us a managerial state where agencies and bureaucracies basically rule things by going around the ballot box."

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Bill O'Reilly: Bill's Column - Are You Poor?

By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Sept 15, 2011
Link to Column
The folks are getting hosed. According to the American Debt Advisor outfit, 80% of us now owe money to creditors. If you exclude mortgages and car payments, 50% of us are in debt. And that's why the economy is having so much trouble. Consumers have to be very careful what they buy, or they risk sinking into insolvency.

Some pundits place the blame on unemployment, currently just over 9%. But that's not what is driving debt. Taxation is.

The mean salary in America is just about $50,000. But if you live in Los Angles, Boston, San Francisco, or New York, earning $50k means you're poor. The cost of living in most urban areas is now so high that a $250,000 salary is middle income. President Obama might not understand this, but we the people do.

Let's take the situation in New York State. New Yorkers like me pay federal income tax, state income tax, New York City income tax, and property taxes if we own a home. In fact, per capita, property taxes in the Empire State are about $1,900 a year. Sales taxes, per capita, are another $1,700 per year.

Gasoline tax in New York: 45 cents a gallon. Cell phone tax and fees? 23% added to your monthly bill. There are also tolls, taxes on your driver's license, cigarettes, and alcohol. The hits just keep on coming.

The only relief for New Yorkers is knowing the tax situation is worse in New Jersey.

All over the USA, working folks are bleeding take-home pay. President Obama says he wants to extend the payroll tax cut, and that's fine. But that's a proverbial drop of water into a bottomless well.

Folks just don't have much money to spend. So, how on earth is the economy going to improve? Who's going to buy stuff? With so much money being taken from everyday Americans by their elected representatives in Washington and in the state capitals, there's simply not enough cash being spent in the marketplace to return the nation to economic prosperity.

Recently, I saw a bumper sticker that read, "Taxes buy civilization. Progressive values are American values." Well, balderdash. Taxes are strangling working Americans. They are creating a society not of self-reliance (almost unaffordable), but of dependence on institutions we can't control--banks, credit card companies, government-generated hand-outs. Now the feds have seized control of the health industry. That will mean even more taxation down the road.

President Obama made a bet that his big government vision would create jobs and prosperity. It has not worked; it never works. Ask Cubans and Venezuelans. Americans now find themselves struggling to pay the bills and utterly dependent on who is paying them a salary.

Upward mobility? Please. Most Americans are just trying to survive. This is not what the pursuit of happiness is all about.

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Davies is Back on the BYU Basketball Team

Not much chatter about this in the media. Not sure why. But I'll post the news here.

PROVO, Utah (August 26, 2011) — Brigham Young University today announced that Brandon Davies has been readmitted to the university and has enrolled for classes for fall semester 2011. With his readmission to the university, Davies has been reinstated on the BYU men's basketball team.

Congratulations Brandon!


See my previous post on the subject:
http://rickdoray.blogspot.com/2011/03/honor.html

Sunday, August 7, 2011

"The Road" to Post-Apocalyptic Dreary Erie

-aHaving read Cormac McCarthy's book, The Road, and not having committed suicide immediately afterwards in a major depressive state of despair and hopelessness, I decided to take another shot at it by watching the movie adaption. And it didn't hurt that it starred Viggio Mortenson. He was one of those actors who I had seen in movies but never really knew or recognized until he was in Lord of the Rings. Suddenly it was like - VIGGIO! He was in lots of familiar flicks. Most of them I liked. So when I saw The Road listed on Netflix, I went ahead and put it in my DVD queue.

The movie is almost as depressing as the book. But I like the dark side. Due to my nature, I sometimes actually seek it out. Gailyn does not, so I watched alone. I was amazed at how many stars that I recognized in the movie. Not that the cast is that big, but I could name most of them. Did The Road get much buzz when it opened? I don't remember the opening. The book won a Pulitzer, but that doesn't always translate well to the screen, nor to big audiences.

I recognized something else. Some of the scenes looked eerily familiar. In fact, they were quite Erie-y. Evidently the final scenes were all shot in Erie. I did a archive search of our local paper. An Erie Times article reported that "shooting locations at Presque Isle State Park include Beach 10 and surrounding areas; Old Lake Road, which is near the park's entrance; and West Fisher Road, ...The crew also will shoot briefly at the nearby Tom Ridge Environmental Center and at a boat ramp in Lawrence Park."

There's an article in the 27 May, 2008, New York Times about the filming of the movie. It says in part:

The producers chose Pennsylvania, one of them, Nick Wechsler, explained, because it’s one of the many states that give tax breaks and rebates to film companies and, not incidentally, because it offered such a pleasing array of post-apocalyptic scenery: deserted coalfields, run-down parts of Pittsburgh, windswept dunes. Chris Kennedy, the production designer, even discovered a burned-down amusement park in Lake Conneaut and an eight-mile stretch of abandoned freeway, complete with tunnel, ideal for filming the scene where the father and son who are the story’s main characters are stalked by a cannibalistic gang traveling by truck.  (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/27/movies/27road.html)
A reader commented on the story:
FYI, a lot of scenes were filmed along the abandoned Pennsylvania Turnpike. It's a 13-mile stretch of abandoned 4-lane superhighway near Breezewood, PA that's been sitting unused since the mid-1960s. The tunnel you see in one of the pictures is the eastern entrance to the Rays Hill tunnel. It's all open to the public.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

The Deadliest Day to Go to the Hospital!

The first Wednesday in August!

New Interns traditionally start on this day.  Statistically there are 45 more deaths in hospitals on this day than any other day of the year!

Friday, July 29, 2011

The Royal Face

I'm a little late with this topic. Prince William married Kate Middleton on April 29. The media has had time to digest the new couple and the potential future queen of Great Britian. I've also had time to let it percolate in my brain. This is what I've come up with.

I admit Kate is kind of cute in that british way. In fact, I think that one day she may be the prettiest woman to ever ascend the throne in Buckingham Palace. Not that she will be the most beautiful woman to  sit as a reigning queen. There is serious competition in Spain with Queen Letizia and Raina in Jordan. But I think Kate may have a shot at being the most beautiful woman to ever sit on England's throne - that wasn't on Henry VIII's lap.

And yes, I know the difference between a queen consort and a queen regent, but I don't have the time, resources, or ambition to look at all the queen consorts. Henry VIII's consorts alone would take more space than Blogger allows.

So, let's look at the record of the Queen Regents:

Matilda


There is Matilda back in 1102.  She could be a dark horse because we don't know what she looked like. Or she could have just looked like a horse. We don't know. Realistic artistic likenesses and representations were not exactly advanced in those days. Or maybe vague likenesses were a much safer way to please your sponsor. Executions could be particular painful experiences.   



  

Queen Jane
Lady Jane Grey may have a shot. Though her claim as an actual queen is disputed by some today. In fact, they disputed it way back in her day. That's why she only sat on the throne for nine days. Lady Jane was executed when she was only 16. Mary I had her beheaded. Jane is a tragic figure. Her family had a claim on the throne and they wanted it back. Enduring a long cold winter sitting around with your servants in a drafty Great Hall appears to inspire ambition to sit around in an even bigger Great Hall with more servants. So Jane was used as a pawn to restore the crown to the Grey side of the family. Jane didn't appear to share these aspirations. But her parents made her. If you saw the movie you know that parents didn't take "no" for an answer in those days. Was Jane cute? Maybe - she was very young. Lady Jane was played by a young Helena Bonham Carter in the movie. So she may have been somewhat cute. This was before the Tim Burton influence; on Helena that is, not Jane. But I digress.
 
Bloody Mary
 Mary I. If you are known to history as Bloody Mary, you might have issues. In Mary's case it was protestants. Mary hated them. Protestants in those days were like mormons and jehovah witnesses today. Mary burned hundreds of protestants at the stake. The reason she didn't burn thousands of them is because she only lived 5 years after ascending the throne. So scheduling issues were a big factor in the number of public burnings at the stake. Mary was the one who put her cousin, Lady Jane, to the executioner's axe. So, yeah, she had a cruel streak. But was she a cutie? Nah, don't think so. But she did inspire a popular alcoholic drink.

Elizabeth I
The 3rd woman in a row to sit on the Throne of England, sat there a long, long time.  Elizabeth I was a super impressive monarch. History marks her as the real architect of the global British Empire on which "the sun never sets." Do we really have to analyze Elizabeth's looks? We've seen how she is played by Cate Blanchett in those boring movies. I can imagine the makeup people sitting around, looking at Cate and exclaiming, "Dang it! Cate is still too pretty to play Elizabeth! Get more sandpaper!"

Queen Mary II
Mary II ruled with her husband, William from 1689 to 1694. Then she died and he ruled alone. Their most remembered contribution to American society is The College of William and Mary. William and Mary was the first school to install an honor code for it's students, and not Brigham Young (like people who follow college basketball think). Mary has that continent look about her. No not incontenence, continent, as in european continent; she looks more french or german. And sadly, she wasn't even the pretty sister. That was Anne. 




Queen Anne
Anne. Younger sister of Mary II.
Heretofore, I have called them the British Monarchs. Technically, Anne was the first British monarch. This is Kate's competition. From her portrait she has a look that possibly could be quite attractive. But Anne's life was a sad one. By 1700, Anne had been pregnant at least eighteen times; thirteen times, she miscarried or gave birth to stillborn children. Of the remaining five children, four died before reaching the age of two years. Anne's sole surviving child, William, Duke of Gloucester, died at the age of eleven on 29 July 1700.




Victoria age 25
 Victoria ruled from 1837-1901 People were born, lived full lives and died with Victoria still on the throne. She reigned over the empire for so long that they named an era after her. She was truly a global monarch. The sun never set on Bristish holdings around the world. People may talk about Victorian attitudes about sex, but she was promiscious enough to have 9 children. Though they were all by just one husband, Albert, so maybe that is different from today. Albert's affections aside, Victoria was not really a looker.



Elizabeth II
Elizabeth II. William's grandmother and current Queen. She is the 40th monarch from William the Conqueror to sit on the throne of England. Elizabeth is coming up on her diamond jubilee in 2012. Speaking of diamonds, she likes the bling, bling. Her jewelry collection is famous. Kate wore Elizabeth's Cartier 'halo' tiara for the wedding ceremony. 
Elizabeth is in her 80's. So, not to be morbid here, but the time is growing shorter until we see if Charles or William will succeed; Camilla or Kate.



Kate Middleton

Monday, July 18, 2011

Book Review: Depression and Diabetes

Depression and Diabetes. Wayne Katon, Mario Maj and Norman Sartorius (Eds.). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell, August 2010. 180 pp. Price: $50.48. ISBN: 9780470688380.
Reviewed by Rick Doray, Jul 18, 2011 

     Although there are shelves and shelves of books dealing with diabetes, and shelves and shelves of books dealing with depression, this is one of only a few books that deal specifically with the relationship, origins and complications of co-occurring depression and diabetes. Published less than a year ago, the focus of Depression and Diabetes is relevantly timed. The latest figures on diabetes released by the World Health Organization are not good. 285 million people worldwide, 6.6% of the population, have type 2 diabetes. Last year, diabetes accounted for 4 million deaths globally (World Diabetes Association, 2011). The World Diabetes Association declared that numbers have reached pandemic levels (Hu, 2011). The number of people with diabetes may climb as high as 400 million by the year 2030, which is almost a hundred million more than the entire population of the United States.
     Though it is well known that depression and diabetes can exist as comorbid conditions, current research in diabetes reveals that there are links to depression that have been hitherto unexplored. Clinicians and researchers have begun to find surprising bidirectional relationships. These relationships are raising new questions about the development and advancement of diabetes. Do we know as much as we thought we did about diabetes? What can the depression-diabetes link tell us about the pathogenic origin of diabetes and what makes certain individuals predisposed to acquiring the disease? Moreover, can this research help medicine find better diabetic treatments or even a cure?
     Depression and Diabetes sets out to explore these questions with a broad overview of what is known, and what science hopes to find out, in the exploration of the interaction between these common disorders. And the book does so admiringly well. Depression and Diabetes has six chapters, each with a different focus on the issues regarding comorbid diabetes mellitus and depression, written by known experts. Chapter topics cover epidemiology, pathogenic origins, health costs, treatment, clinical management, and socio-cultural aspects of health management.
     The editors are well known psychiatrists among their peers. Dr. Wayne Katon is a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle. Dr. Mario Maj is the Department of Psychiatry Chair at the University of Naples in Italy.  Dr. Norman Sartorius has an impressive curriculum vita which includes being the former Director, World Health Organization’s Mental Health Group, former President of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) and several professorships at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, the University of Prague and Zagreb, among others.
      Depression and Diabetes is directed at the clinical medicine community and, to a lesser degree, the professional mental health community in general. This is not surprising since it is a publication of Wiley-Blackwell and the World Psychiatric Association and is one in a series of books dealing with depression and its comorbid conditions. The others in the series deal with depression and co-occurring heart disease and cancer. The writing is consistent with the credentials of the authors. They write at a post-graduate level and not for the general public. The reading level is fairly complex and medical terminology is used extensively. Even though I have a background involving medical terminology, I found myself googling medically related vocabulary terms more than once. The average nonprofessional might get lost in the “doc-talk” which permeates the book, but the material can be conquered with a little patience and perseverance.
     Chapter 1 deals with the epidemiology of the depression-diabetes link.  The authors provide an excellent overview of how diabetes has traditionally been seen as a risk factor for depression. But here, the authors present new research showing that the reverse is also true. Depression can act as a risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes. The chapter covers recent data showing the prevalence of increased complications and higher mortality rates for patients with comorbid severe depression and diabetes.
     The best chapter is written by Dr. Khalida Ismail, “Unraveling the Pathogenesis of the Depression-Diabetes Link.” Dr. Ismail gives an excellent overview of the various theoretical mechanisms that may explain the depression-diabetes link. This is no small task given the competing possible explanations and the way they intertwine with each other. Ismail gives an explanation of each “link” theory model, including: The psychological, insulin resistance, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, autonomic nervous system, genetics, and birth weight and childhood trauma. 
     The autonomic nervous system theory was the most interesting to me. This theory builds upon the “macrophage theory of depression.” Essentially, the body’s immune system causes macrophages (white blood cells) and nervous system glial cells to release pro-inflammatory cytokines into the bloodstream during times of stress. These cytokines have been associated with pancreatic β-cell apoptosis (cell death), insulin resistance and coronary artery disease. The pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulate the sympathetic nervous system, increasing cortisol production.  This, in turn, causes the body to increase production of visceral fat.  As a person becomes more obese, pro-cytokine production in the body increases at the newly formed adipose tissue. With the increased number of fat cells, more cytokines are released into the system than in previous cycles. As stress continues, there is a feedback loop through the nervous system, releasing more cytokines and stimulating more cortisol production. Not only does this produce more pancreatic β-cell death, eventually resulting in diabetes, but the cytokines begin interfering with the chemistry of the brain.  This can produce behavioral changes, including depressive conditions.   
     One topic that received less than full attention concerned the clinical treatment of depression-diabetes as covered in chapter 5. Though Hellman and Ciechanowski provided a case for coordination of care and the benefits of depression treatment in diabetic clinics, they did not specify exactly what that plan of care might entail. This omission may be due to the fact that medicine is just now catching on to the realization of a depression-diabetes link outside of the traditional psychological model. Unfortunately, after Ismail’s excellent chapter on the models of disease development it would have been nice to see an equally comprehensive coverage of the models of disease treatment. It would be my recommendation that future additions include a chapter outlining new models of treatment.
     As this is a new and previously unexplored territory for medicine, the possibility of a widening scope of knowledge with further research is encouraging. The challenge for medicine is to adapt current models of treatment to incorporate what we are learning about the pathogenesis of the depression-diabetes link. Depression and Diabetes is an excellent early entry into the professional literature on this topic. I recommend this book to anyone who has a personal investment in diabetic care and to all primary care and family physicians who routinely diagnose and treat diabetic patients. I expect that several more books covering newly discovered facets of this topic, as well as further volumes from the World Psychiatric Association, will be forthcoming. 


References


Hu, F. (2011, July 9). Diet and exercise for new-onset type 2 diabetes? The Lancet, 378 , pp. 101-102.
World Diabetes Association. (2011, May 5). Diabetes Facts. Retrieved July 6, 2011, from http://www.worlddiabetesfoundation.org/composite-35.htm

Monday, June 27, 2011

British Researchers Say Starvation Can “Cure” Type 2 Diabetes

By Thomas H. Maugh II Los Angeles Times
Posted: 06/26/2011 08:56:14 PM PDT
Updated: 06/26/2011 10:34:44 PM PDT

British researchers have developed what they say is a "cure" for Type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the disease. And all you have to do is starve yourself for eight weeks.

Roy Taylor, head of the magnetic resonance imaging unit at Newcastle University in Britain, and his colleagues studied 11 patients who had developed diabetes later in life and who had had it for several years. The patients averaged 220 pounds at the beginning of the study. Each was put on a 600-calorie-per-day diet that included a special diet drink and non-starchy vegetables, such as broccoli, asparagus and cabbage. The diet was followed for eight weeks.

Taylor reported Saturday at a San Diego meeting of the American Diabetes Association and in the journal Diabetologia that, after one week on the diet, each of the patients' fasting blood sugar, taken before breakfast, had returned to normal. At the end of the eight weeks, the patients had lost an average of 33 pounds and had no signs of diabetes. Three months after returning to a normal diet, seven of them remained free of the disease. Average weight gain in that three months was 6.5 pounds.

Taylor believes he has an explanation for the results. At the beginning of the study, MRI scans of the patients' pancreases showed that they held an elevated level of fat, 8 percent compared with the normal 6 percent. That extra fat impairs the organ's ability to produce insulin, he speculated. At the end of the study, fat levels in the pancreas were down to normal in each patient. [Can this actually be the key to "curing" Diabetes Mellitus?] 

"We believe that this shows that Type 2 diabetes is all about energy balance in the body," Taylor said in a statement. "If you are eating more (calories) than you burn, then the excess is stored in the liver and pancreas as fat, which can lead to Type 2 diabetes in some people. What we need to examine further is why some people are more susceptible to developing diabetes than others."

He added, "We used the 600-calorie diet to test a hypothesis. What I can tell you definitively is that if people lose substantial weight by normal means, they will lose their diabetes."

An estimated 25 million Americans have Type 2 diabetes, in which the body does not respond properly to insulin produced by the pancreas. Experts recommend that patients consult with a doctor before attempting such an extreme diet.